ANOTHER LOOK AT SELECTIVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH
(By Carl A. Patton, 14 April 2008)
Upon this land roamed many
that saw not the great utility
in being steadfast on things of
Therefore the painting could be
painted black for those White
and Black for White. Consistency
thus was lost in a no man’s land
of contradictory, discrepant in-
consistent looks at free speech.
However many thought as sure
as the sacred text and “on one
accord.” The wise thought that
this should also apply to the
Academic institutions stood up in
amazement claiming freedom among
the academicians however there was
an exclusive fraternity there. Freedom
riding the academic back left God and
Truth and ended up in a place of purged
Amazing better still were the writer’s,
journalists, authors the great story-
tellers and poets. Some wrote for
newspapers and magazines they also
reclined in radio, television and the big
wide Hollywood screen.
Brother Constitution also saw them
interpret the speech that was free
among their group as they also selected
the 1st amendment for them.
Meanwhile the man who thrived
on principles being absent of prejudiced
thinking and seeking not to discriminate
against anybody allowed free and loud
voices to all bound by the rule of the
common but God given law.
God thus selected our free speech.
This speech was for all, the one in the
same. Just how could one law become so
diverse and changing with the wind?
All rights reserved by FreedomJournal Press 2007-2008.