EINSTEIN: GOD, RELIGION & SCIENCE

 

PART 19: EINSTEIN: THE DEFINITIVE QUALITIES OF SEPARABILITY

 

Part 106: Does Satan Blind Those Who Do Not See That The Old Covenant Was Temporary

Part 2: Defining the Remnant

www.freedomjournalpress.com

 


 

 

In the name of God Master, of the Universe, Ruler of the earth

 

Editors Note: Walking never stumbling to fall through this barren land allows much to be seen, heard and I feel the Wind. Meanwhile there are no circumstances where God was/is not in the midst. We say again more than once that you cannot use or abuse a righteous man as God can see all things before they were before are after. However, we have a responsibility to look out over the landscape. We now return to Dr. E. and to some, more important things.

 

Greetings Brethren,

 

 

Peace be unto you. To the Church and believing Christians everywhere. To those that believe in the Bible as the supreme authority that governs all of humankind. In this we give thanks to God the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit that leads and guides us the straightway.

 

As we continue our discussion on Einstein and what he saw as the second component of his theories on realism we now bring up for review his belief in separability and locality. In other words, objects are located at certain points in space-time, and this separability is part of what defines them. “If one abandons the assumption that what exists in different parts of space has its own independent, real existence, then I simply cannot see what it is that physics is supposed to describe,” he declared to Max Born. (“Einstein His Life and Times,” Walter Isaacson, p. 461).

 

Is there truly and individual nature among all things? My hand presented separate fingers but they were all interrelated.

Many have come to distort the essence of Truth. Some of the most prominent thinkers have been Marxists. For the record the data base of some of the people noted as the world's greatest scholars are limited by their denial of God and things Spiritual. Therefore the economic analysis of the historical, political, social, and psychological problems of humankind is limited when the researcher etc. does not know God. With God my beloved we can reach a “Methodology for Obtaining Big Truth” and not the little truth of the ungodly.

 

For the record we call your attention to an article written by Dr. E. in “Introduction to Socialism” edited by Leo Huberman and Paul M. Sweezy, “Why Socialism.” Einstein wrote this article for the first issue of Monthly Review, May 1949. He closed the article with the following paragraph: “Clarity about the aims and problems of socialism is of greatest significance in our age of transition. Since, under present circumstances, free and unhindered discussion of these problems has come under a powerful taboo, I consider the foundation of this magazine to be an important public service.”

 

Socialism and Truth: Marx Saw Class: Jesus Sees Humankind

 

Realism was now getting down to the nitty gritty.

So are the parallels of the physical reality and the

social reality. Nothing although separate dwelleth

in isolation. There was no tree without the soil the rain

and sunshine. There was also no fusion of matter

without some natural disturbance.

 

The definitive quality of several terms is a main ingredient in developing a method toward Spiritual/Scientific inquiry of Social Science phenomenon. Therefore, the essence of Scientific Inquiry must be redefined. Scientific inquiry also must take on the component of Spiritual Science. However, we will bring more clarity to our distinct method of inquiry later. (Excerpts taken from “The Methodology For Obtaining Truth: Part 5: Definitive Qualities Toward The Essence Of Truth.” Carl A. Patton, FreedomJournal Press).

 

But how did economic thinking of the Marxists

impact on the likes of Einstein? Was the digestion of

economics and the social sciences necessary for

his balance in physics? Surely we can see why he

gained not a clearance to work on the Manhattan

Project.

 

The theories of Marx, Lenin, Engels and Hegel stand in opposition to those espoused by the Capitalists and those in a Democracy. However, Marxism, Socialism and Communism have great commonalities. Marxism is the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. They interpreted history as a continuing economic class struggle and believed that the eventual result would be the establishment of a classless society and communal ownership of all natural and industrial resources.

Socialism is also tied to Marxism and has similar components. Thus Socialism is a theory or system of social organization by which the means of production and distribution are owned, managed, or controlled by the government (state Socialism) or by associations of workers. Also we see that the Socialist Party is a political party that favors and supports Socialism.
Communism is also a part of this political philosophy that is counter to Capitalism and Democracy. Communism is a theory or system of government according to which a commune is self-governing and the state is a federation of communes. A Commune or Communal has to do with a community; public. Owned jointly by all; use of and participated in by all members of a group or community. (Taken from “Censorship Further Defined: Part 4: The Marxist, Socialist and Communist.” Carl A. Patton, FreedomJournal Press).

 

 

But back to the parallels of the physical separability

and things in the social sciences. But better yet follow

us to the Bible where we love to feast and enjoy.

There is no understanding of the Great Commission

without knowledge of the passing of the Apostles

and the Spiritual Gifts.

 

Now tell us FreedomJournal what of the meaning of dialectics? Have the Marxist corrupted or enhanced our understanding of dialectics?

 

"Truth, if the Truth be known, the Marxists have clouded our understanding of the economic and historical realities as seen through dialectics. The Scientific realm of thought that excludes things Spiritual that seeks to answer questions of historical, political, economic, sociological and psychological nature are limited. Thus, the Marxists have a limited vision of the world and its people. The vision they do have is one that hates or the tunnel syndrome that denies left and right what is below and what is above.

 

 

Thus to take either concept separate removes the

greatest understanding. Just reasoning why so many

people have gross confusion about the contemporary

Great Commission while some even believe some Apostles

still thrive and exist and come as those that are saved

speaking in tongues not in any foreign language but in

the spirit tongues that no one understands.

 

An early use of dialectics was its use in discussion and reasoning by using dialogue as a method of intellectual investigation. Thus, in times past we saw Socratic techniques of exposing false beliefs and eliciting truth."

 

Well-said FreedomJournal.

 "Then dialectics is any systematic reasoning, exposition, or argument that juxtaposes opposed or contradictory ideas and usually seeks to resolve their conflict.  So can we determine that dialectics is the act or practice of logical discussions employed in finding out the truth of a theory or opinion? Hence dialectics is the branch of logic that consists of formal rhetorical reasoning. This method of logic is based on the resolution of contemporary opposite’s thesis, and anti-thesis leading up to synthesis."

 

 

Meanwhile as the parallel discussion gains fuel and merit

we see a just cause why there should also be a move to

ascertain the exact certainty of the social sciences. Is this

possible? Why ask such a question when there is ample

reasoning to prove and say so however it is not politically

correct but the spiritual scientist never said so.

 

But FreedomJournal have we said enough about the Marxist corrupting dialectical materialism and historical materialism?

 

"Truth we can never say it all. However, the material and historical circumstances of humankind brought up for review without God is null and void. Let the record show again that the only way to unravel the mysteries of life is through the knowledge of the Creator. Thus, the Marxist greatest error was the denial of the Creator. Meanwhile, they are not alone in this nonsensical distortion of Truth.

 

Thus, when we take dialectics and utilize it in a rational sense we can see the reality of a distinct methodology for obtaining Truth."

 

Cont. Part 20: Physics & Reality Vs. Spiritual Reality

 

Part 3: Further Defining Remnant: Spared Because of Faith

 

 

Peace and Golden Paradise, Carl A. Patton a willing slave and servant of Almighty God writing for the FreedomJournal Press 3 April 2009 in the year of our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus.

 

Return to Einstein Page

carl@freedomjournalpress.comcastbiz.net