EINSTEIN: GOD, RELIGION & SCIENCE

Part 42: Has Satan Blinded Many Toward The Truth of The Church?

Part 43: The Dragon Controls The Beast

www.freedomjournalpress.com

 

 

 

 


PART 15: EINSTEIN, MAX BORN, SCHRODINGER: SPOOKY ACTION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

 

In the name of God Master, of the Universe, Ruler of the earth

 

Editors Note:  Greed and dirty foul money continues to infect the land as all kinds of schemes continue to defraud the poor. Meanwhile the rich the chief executives receive bonus payments for nothing.  Stimulus payments are only seen in those that need no stimulus as they need no social programs to eat, sleep or for the basic needs of human existence. However rest assured God needs nothing material.

 

Greetings Brethren,

 

 

Peace be unto you. To the Church and believing Christians everywhere. To those that believe in the Bible as the supreme authority that governs all of humankind. In this we give thanks to God the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit that leads and guides us the straightway.

 

To Einstein, realism and localism were related underpinnings of physics. As he declared to his friend Max Born, coining a memorable phrase, “Physics should represent a reality in time and space, free from spooky action at a distance.”   (“Einstein His Life and Universe,” Walter Isaacson, p. 450).

                           

Meanwhile, Einstein conspires with his colleague Schrodinger in an attempt to note the contradictions in quantum mechanics. “I do not believe in it,” Einstein declared flatly. He ridiculed as “spiritualistic” the notion that there could be “spooky action at a distance,” and he attacked the idea that there was no reality beyond our ability to observe things. “This epistemology-soaked orgy ought to burn itself out,” he said. “No doubt, however, you smile at me and think that, after all, many a young whore turns into an old praying sister, and many a young revolutionary becomes an old reactionary.” (p. 454).

 

Physics as a science seeks to unravel the properties and interrelationships of matter and energy. Some as did Einstein thought that the local or regional customs also benefited this science.  Meanwhile realism depended on the practical and what made sense…whatever that means. Also it noted the doctrine that material objects have an existence independent of our consciousness of them. It also can mean that realism is a doctrine that reveals general ideas that have a real existence independent of the mind. But what was “Spooky Action,” especially from a distance?

 

Brethren is there truly an enigma in looking at Einstein. Here he declares that the “Spooky Action” was indeed spiritualistic. But he goes on to accept that there is a reality beyond our ability to see things. Is this “Spooky Action” at a distance? However do all great thinkers and those that seek the utter unlimited knowledge that exists eventually move further to the left? Or does the left meet the right? What of the epistemological findings of the FreedomJournal on the “Methodology For Obtaining Truth?”

 

Beyond Human Comprehension: But A Reality

 

The quantum theorists looked at the mechanics

of the smallest measurement of matter and

radiation, atomic structures and related things

listed in the realm of phenomena. But what

kind of physicists also leaned on the spiritual

world?

 

Is there more knowledge than man will admit to? What does (man) the creatures of the earth actually know? If man seeks to lift himself up can he ever realize the Truth of God? (Prose in this ProVerse piece is taken from “The Methodology For Obtaining Truth,” Part 1: Spiritual Science Is The Most Exact Science,” by Carl A. Patton, FreedomJournal Press).

 

Could you thus believe in “Spooky Action” even

at a distance and really be a dyed-in cotton or

wool scientists? Meanwhile could realism actually

thrive on those that believe that anything existed

as to thought and ideas independent of the mind?

Was not the brain the head piece of information?

 

"Spiritific knowledge" comes out of the righteous Truth-Seeker. This realm of thought will allow the High-Road to Truth, Wisdom and Knowledge.

 

Einstein was a great thinker and epistemologists.

He did as some care to preach and teach change the

whole concept of physics and its epistemological

groundings. But can thought, science as to things social

be immune from such great revelations and revolution?

 

We can best describe the Spiritual Scientist by noting what he is devoid of. Thus, we will draw a brief comparative analysis of the Spiritual Scientist and the Physical Scientist. Most Physical Scientists are atheists. They believe that things that cannot be proven do not exist. Generally Physical Scientists with the mood of atheism and agnosticism wallow and submerge themselves in disbelief of God and the Creation. Therefore God is non-existent to them because no one can scientifically prove that God exists.  Many Physical Scientists also create means of mass destruction.

 

Can social science be determined just as exact as

those that reached out for the Spooks of quantum

mechanics? Although claiming that there was some

thing or a reality beyond our ability to observe or

see was still not “Spooky Action” near or afar?

Was this man surely a Spiritual Scientist but in denial?

 

So who is the Spiritual Scientist? First of all the Spiritual Scientist incorporates all other disciplines of study into his vision and view of the world and its people. He believes that God is the center of Truth. In fact he declares that God is Truth.

 

Is there any way pray tell me that one can see

completely without God? We hear great talk of the

blind and those in spiritual darkness. However many

wear glasses, eye-wear and still cannot see. Can you

really see nature and harness energy without God?

Can one be steeped in empiricism and be a Spiritual Scientist?

 

The Spiritual Scientist goes on to reveal that the Spirit of God guides Truth. He believes that the Spiritual Scientist which of course takes in the Social Sciences is unique and is an all-encompassing discipline and method of study. As an exact Science is rendered outside the realm of the Physical Sciences, it is made possible by the motivations and methodologies rendered by the Spiritual Scientist. Thus, Social Science phenomenon’s and concerns can become confirmed in a manner of precision and exactness.

 

The observation and experiments came by way of living

and observing humankind. However theory came with

practice as the Spiritual man looked on all things he thus was

able to see beyond human comprehension. This he carried

as responsible as the high road of Truth only came as he

looked down and up.

 

The Spiritual Scientist is distinct and apart but not alone. The most apt Social Scientist in order to reach the high road of Truth and accuracy must become a Spiritual Scientist. Hence, one can move to the ranks of Spiritual Science with credentials in History and Political Science. However in order for the Spiritual Scientist to grow and develop he must reach down and embrace the various disciplines of study that make him whole.

 

There have been many days among the God driven

intellects that they can and will never be able to explain.

However they wait on time as time does not wait. The

way of the wind is beyond our comprehension but it

is real as I felt it pass me by. I woke up this morning

my mind felt the surreal but it was for real.

 

The explanation of the miraculous and miracles are very important toward our discussion of the world and the definitive qualities of the Spiritual Scientist. Can the miraculous ever be explained? Can the Spiritual Scientist also explain the existence of miracles in the healing process? Will there always be a void and a realm of the unknown for those in the flesh?

 

The Spiritual Scientist can therefore make exact conclusions of many concerns in the Social Sciences. How can this be? Yes, how can Social Science become an exact science with kinship to mathematics? Further revelations concerning the definitive qualities of the Spiritual Scientist may answer the previous questions.

 

Cont. Part 16: Einstein: Causality Vs. Realism, What Is Reality?

Educational Default? Slaughter of The Law?

 

 

Peace and Golden Paradise, Carl A. Patton a willing slave and servant of Almighty God writing for the FreedomJournal Press 20 March 2009 in the year of our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus.

Return to Einstein Page

carl@freedomjournalpress.comcastbiz.net